Seth Godin just shared some
learnings from an alternative MBA program he created. One aspect particularly caught my attention:
It's interesting to realize that the way I did the application process certainly changed the list of who applied. Same thing happens with jobs, I bet. Your applicants reflect your methods.
Laura is a star performer. She recently started to apply for jobs with the goal of moving to a smaller city, and she has reported huge differences on the application process of large companies. The criteria she is now using to select where to apply has "user-friendly application process" as one of the most important requirements. Companies that demand that candidates create an account, log in, upload their resume and then enter again all the information (education, previous employers, years worked there, etc.) field by field, are not going to get an application from her. Simpler application processes, which may require registration but allow candidates to choose between copying and pasting your resume or uploading a file, or, even better, offer the option of just sending a resume and cover letter to an actual person, are the ones that she is responding to.
Employers should think about what type of people they are trying to recruit, and adapt their application methods accordingly. This is not to say that companies that create hurdles for applicants to overcome are wrong; it's just that an organization that makes candidates go through a boring, time-consuming process of entering information in specific fields is advertising that flexibility and consideration for employees is not to the forefront in their minds. Candidates like Laura are just thankful that companies are letting them know that so soon in their recruiting process.
Comments